Case 2302868/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T MacDonagh v Surrey and Sussex healthcare NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302868/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr Fairbank, Mr Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T MacDonagh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The deductions were £2,711.39 between February 2019 and March 2022, arising from payment at the incorrect hourly rate, and £159.94 between March 2022 and October 2022, arising from incorrectly deducted employee pension contributions.
The judgment records that those deducted sums had already been paid to the claimant, so no payment order was made and, by consent, there was no further remedy beyond the declaration. The remaining complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages failed.
The complaints of age discrimination failed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared unauthorised deductions of £2,711.39 and £159.94, but recorded that the respondent had already paid those sums and made no order for payment. The remaining unauthorised deduction complaints failed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaints of age discrimination failed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.