Case 2302869/2016 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2017
- Case reference
- 2302869/2016
- Decision date
- 2 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wallis JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 26 April 2017, Employment Judge Wallis recorded that the harassment claim and the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them. The judgment also records that miscellaneous parts of the remaining claims, withdrawn by the claimant during the case management discussion, were dismissed.
The tribunal dismissed the third respondent, Ms S Martin, from the proceedings and refused the claimant's application to join Mr Wilson as a respondent. The respondents' application to strike out various claims was refused, and the remaining claims were listed to proceed to a hearing under separate case management orders. No monetary remedy was awarded at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.