Case 2302884/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sulaiman v Flavourtown Bakery Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302884/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sulaiman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at London South Employment Tribunal heard the case by video on 11 January 2023 before Employment Judge Robinson. The Respondent did not attend. The judgment records that Mrs Sulaiman was represented by her husband, Mr Azeer.
The tribunal upheld a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. The decision is stated in brief oral form and no written reasons were provided.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £2,543.59 gross, describing that sum as the amount due. It also recorded that the Respondent would be entitled to deduct any tax and national insurance contributions due before payment to the Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,544 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,544
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.