Case 2302925/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Leadec Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302925/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr O Ammour did not have the necessary continuity of employment to bring a claim of unfair dismissal. It also recorded that none of the exceptions to the continuity requirement had been alleged by him.
On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was struck out and dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant did not have the necessary continuity of employment to present an unfair dismissal claim, and that no exception to the continuity requirement had been alleged. The claim was struck out and dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.