Case 2302929/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Kothary v Eaglemoss Ltd (in Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302929/2022
- Decision date
- 5 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms Mitchell, Mrs Jerram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Kothary
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18 May 2023, before Employment Judge Dyal, Ms Mitchell and Mrs Jerram, the Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal recorded that Eaglemoss Limited (in administration) was in breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to a protective award under section 189 of that Act. It fixed a protected period of 90 days beginning on 5 August 2022, being the date on which the first dismissal to which the complaint related took effect.
The amount of the protective award was assessed at £18,334.16. No other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found a breach of s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and awarded a protective award under s.189. | Upheld | — | £18,334 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,334
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.