Case 2302940/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Earle v Wykenham-Hurford Sheppard & Son Limited HELD AT: Croydon (remotely by video) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302940/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCann
- Panel members
- Ms H Bharadia, Ms S Moores
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Earle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely at Croydon before Judge Cowx with Ms H Bharadia and Ms S Moores, dismissed the claimant’s claims of direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability under section 15, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21, and three claims of harassment related to disability under section 26. Each claim was described as unfounded.
On 23 December 2023 Employment Judge McCann had made deposit orders against four of the claims, requiring £10 for each claim. After those claims failed for substantially the same reasons as in the deposit orders, the tribunal ordered under section 39(5) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure that the deposits be paid to the respondent, on the basis that the claimant had acted unreasonably in pursuing those claims. Oral reasons were given, and written reasons were not provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | One of three harassment claims related to disability; the judgment does not distinguish the three individually. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | One of three harassment claims related to disability; the judgment does not distinguish the three individually. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | One of three harassment claims related to disability; the judgment does not distinguish the three individually. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Section 13 Equality Act 2010
- Section 15 Equality Act 2010
- Sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- Section 26 Equality Act 2010
- Section 39(5) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.