Case 2303017/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms DE Bader v Allianz Management Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303017/2018
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms DE Bader
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs DE Bader brought age, race, religion or belief and disability discrimination complaints against Allianz Management Services Limited. On 20 August 2020, Employment Judge Khalil recorded that the age, race and religion or belief claims were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of those claims. The judgment also records that the claimant withdrew her disability discrimination allegations save for four allegations that were addressed separately.
Of the disability allegations, the Tribunal held that the allegations referred to in paragraph 5 issue 1 (large print policy document) and paragraph 5 issue 6 (software for survey form) were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. The allegation at paragraph 5 issue 4 (workshop) was struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) and (e) for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 30 September 2019, alternatively because a fair trial was not possible. The only remaining disability allegation was that the claimant was interrupted from typing to answer telephone calls because of the large font size on her screen, but the supplied text does not record a final merits determination on that allegation and no remedy is set out.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of the age discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of the race discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of the religion or belief discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant withdrew the disability discrimination allegations except for four allegations. Two allegations (paragraph 5 issue 1, large print policy document, and paragraph 5 issue 6, software for survey form) were found to be out of time and the Tribunal declined to extend time. The allegation at paragraph 5 issue 4 (workshop) was struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) and (e) for non-compliance with the order of 30 September 2019, alternatively because a fair trial was not possible. The remaining allegation concerned being interrupted from typing to answer telephone calls because of the large font size on the screen; the supplied text does not record a final merits outcome. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(c) and (e) ET Rules of Procedure 2013
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.