Case 2303029/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A R Trice v London & South Eastern Railway Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303029/2018
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
- Venue
- Ashford
- Panel members
- Mrs J Jerram, Mr P Adkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A R Trice
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Ashford hearing on 24-26 September 2019, Employment Judge Corrigan sat with Mrs J Jerram and Mr P Adkins. The Tribunal found that Mr A R Trice had been unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed by London & South Eastern Railway Limited.
On the wrongful dismissal claim, the Tribunal awarded damages of £1,388.35. The judgment states that this figure was calculated as five weeks' pay of £1,753.85 less five weeks' Jobseeker's Allowance of £365.50.
The Tribunal did not find a contravention of the Equality Act 2010 in relation to discrimination arising from disability, so that complaint was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Damages of £1,388.35 were awarded, calculated as 5 weeks' pay of £1,753.85 minus 5 weeks' Jobseeker's Allowance of £365.50. | Upheld | — | £1,388 |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found no contravention of the Equality Act 2010 (discrimination arising from disability). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,388
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.