Case 2303101/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v John Lewis plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303101/2017
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies. That
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out and dismissed the claims in their entirety. The hearing listed for 25 February 2020 was vacated.
The reasons state that Regional Employment Judge Davies made an unless order on 17 December 2019 requiring the claimant to take certain steps by 3 February 2020. The order was sent to the claimant by email on 8 January 2020.
The claimant did not comply with the order and had not contacted the Tribunal since. Employment Judge K Andrews concluded that it was appropriate for the claims to be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claims were struck out and dismissed in their entirety after non-compliance with an unless order. The specific claim label is taken from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claims were struck out and dismissed in their entirety after non-compliance with an unless order. The specific claim label is taken from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claims were struck out and dismissed in their entirety after non-compliance with an unless order. The specific claim label is taken from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claims were struck out and dismissed in their entirety after non-compliance with an unless order. The specific claim label is taken from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claims were struck out and dismissed in their entirety after non-compliance with an unless order. The specific claim label is taken from the gov.uk listing categories rather than enumerated in the judgment text. | Struck out |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.