Case 2303138/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Thomas v Waitrose plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303138/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 03 November 2023, the tribunal gave Mr N Thomas an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why his unfair dismissal, race discrimination and holiday pay claims should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 03 November 2023 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
Mr Thomas did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 11 January 2024. The judgment records no determination of the merits of the underlying claims and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal's 03 November 2023 order gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on this claim before strike out; no representations were received. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal's 03 November 2023 order referred to race discrimination as one of the claims that had not been complied with and had not been actively pursued; no representations were received. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal's 03 November 2023 order referred to holiday pay as one of the claims that had not been complied with and had not been actively pursued; no representations were received. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.