Case 2303144/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Boudjama v ISS Mediclean Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303144/2021
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Boudjama
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Hearing Centre in public by CVP on 24 September 2022 before Employment Judge McLaren. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr O Tahzib.
The tribunal dismissed all of the proceedings. The complaints of unfair dismissal and detrimental treatment and/or dismissal for making a protected disclosure were presented after the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for those complaints to have been submitted in time, that there was no reason to extend time, and that it had no jurisdiction to hear them.
The complaint of race discrimination was also presented after the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit and that it had no jurisdiction to hear that complaint. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was presented after the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to submit it in time, there was no reason to extend time, and it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as complaints of detrimental treatment and/or dismissal for making a protected disclosure. They were dismissed as out of time, with no extension and no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the complaint was presented after the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time and it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.