Case 2303243/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Marius Bulimar v STM Group (UK) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303243/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marius Bulimar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal via CVP on 30 July 2021 before Employment Judge Mr. M. Salter. The extracted judgment records that Marius Bulimar's breach of contract claim against STM Group (UK) Limited failed and was dismissed.
The same judgment also records that the respondent employer's counterclaim failed and was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out the legal basis of the counterclaim or any substantive findings on it.
The respondent's application for a preparation time order also failed and was dismissed. The extracted record contains no monetary award and no split of any remedy because all applications and claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent employer's counterclaim failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not identify the legal basis of the counterclaim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's application for a preparation time order failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.