Case 2303278/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. J. Maddison-Roberts v Avios Group (AGL) Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303278/2018
- Decision date
- 30 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs. J. Maddison-Roberts
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short rule 60 judgment dated 30 January 2019 and recorded as being issued without a hearing. The only substantive disposal stated in the extracted text is that the Claimant's claims against the Second Respondent, Mr Paul Rutt, were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying factual background, the legal basis of the claims, or any merits findings against either respondent. It also does not record any remedy, liability findings, or reasons beyond the procedural disposal.
Because the text supplied does not identify the individual claim heads, the case is recorded conservatively as a withdrawn claim of unspecified type. No panel members are listed in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it only records that the Claimant's claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.