Case 2303316/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ghalamcis v East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303316/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ghalamcis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard by Employment Judge Khalil sitting alone at London South via CVP on 9 March 2023. The claimant, Mr Ghalamcis, appeared in person and the respondent, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim brought under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, stating that it was not well founded. It also dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim, likewise stating that it was not well founded.
The written record states that reasons were given at the time. No monetary award was made and no remedy figures are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim brought under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.94/98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.