Case 2303340/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Estrella v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303340/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HART Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Estrella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment dated 28 March 2025 and sent to the parties on 31 March 2025, Employment Judge Hart recorded that the claimant had withdrawn four complaints and dismissed them under rule 51. The dismissed complaints were direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, unpaid holiday pay, and unlawful deduction from wages.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining complaints, as identified in the Case Management Order of 27 March 2025, were to proceed to a hearing. No liability findings or remedy awards are recorded in this judgment for the dismissed complaints.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment identifies this as direct race discrimination on the grounds of the claimant's race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment identifies this as harassment related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment identifies this as unpaid holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.