Case 2303417/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Jones v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303417/2018
- Decision date
- 15 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr F Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the proceedings against the second respondent, Pulse Healthcare t/a Staffbank, were dismissed upon withdrawal. No determination is recorded in the judgment against the first respondent, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, and the judgment does not specify the underlying claim type.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time. No remedy, monetary award, or legal test is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings against the second respondent, Pulse Healthcare t/a Staffbank, were dismissed upon withdrawal. It does not identify the pleaded claim type in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.