Case 2303480/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Rockingham v Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303480/2022
- Decision date
- 2 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Rockingham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 October 2024, the tribunal gave Mr A Rockingham an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the tribunal order dated 12 December 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment states simply that the claim is struck out. It does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the dispute, and no remedy was awarded.
The reasons also record that the hearing fixed for 10 March 2025 will not take place. The order is dated 18 December 2024 and was sent to the parties on 2 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-compliance with an order dated 12 December 2023 and for not being actively pursued. It does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.