Case 2303500/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Osige v Pinnacle Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303500/2021
- Decision date
- 27 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Osige
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis decision does not determine the substantive employment claims in the case. The hearing was listed at Croydon by CVP on 27 April 2022 before Employment Judge Self, with Mr E Osige appearing in person and Pinnacle Group represented by Miss C Holman, solicitor.
The respondent was allowed to participate for the purpose of making an application to postpone the hearing. After hearing both parties, the tribunal postponed the hearing. The judgment then records a preparation time order against the respondent in the sum of £272 under Rules 76(1)(c) and 79 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The respondent was directed to pay that sum within 14 days and, as a condition precedent to any application to extend time, to send a written application to extend time for presenting a response, together with a draft response complying with Rule 20(1), by 4 pm on 6 May 2022. The claimant was directed to send any document explaining why such an application was opposed. Any application to extend time was to be considered by Employment Judge Self on the papers and without a hearing, provided the preparation time order had been complied with.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment and directions record a postponed hearing, a successful respondent postponement application under Rule 21(3), and a preparation time order of £272 payable within 14 days. No substantive tribunal claim was determined in this decision. | Other | — | £272 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £272
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21(3) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 76(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 79 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 20(1) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.