Case 2303536/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Hart (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303536/2018
- Decision date
- 25 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Bryant QC
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms A Hart (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with one preliminary issue in this judgment. It struck out the claimant's allegation of harassment related to disability, which was based on the respondent's alleged failure to admit disability in response to the claimant's first tribunal claim, as set out in paragraph 10 and part of paragraph 14 of the attachment to the second ET1.
The tribunal held that this allegation had no reasonable prospect of success. No substantive findings were made on the merits of that allegation, and no remedy was awarded in respect of it.
The judgment states that the remaining claims would proceed and would be the subject of separate case management orders.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal struck out the claimant's allegation of harassment related to disability, described as the respondent's failure to admit disability in response to his first tribunal claim, because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.