Case 2303589/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Faria Abdoelradjak v Blingbling Shoes.co.uk Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303589/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Date
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Faria Abdoelradjak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 23 November 2022 before Judge McLaren, with the respondent not present, the tribunal quantified the awards after the claimant's unfair dismissal claim had already been upheld. For unfair dismissal, the judge awarded a basic award of £461.52, a compensatory award of £2,999.88 for 26 weeks' loss of earnings from 14 July 2021 to 10 January 2022, and a 20% ACAS uplift of £600, giving a stated total unfair dismissal award of £4,061.5.
The tribunal also found that the respondent contravened section 26 of the Equality Act 2010, so the discrimination claim succeeded. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic relied on. The claimant was awarded £8,000 for injury to feelings.
The claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The judge awarded £172 for one holiday-year calculation and a further £461.52 based on the claimant's part-time entitlement, giving a total of £633.52. A further award of four weeks' pay, £461.52, was made because the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states total compensation payable of £13,156.44.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Already upheld before this remedy judgment. The listed components are a basic award of £461.52, a compensatory award of £2,999.88, and a 20% ACAS uplift of £600; the subcomponents total £4,061.40, while the judgment states £4,061.5. | Upheld | — | £4,062 |
| Harassment | The judgment says the respondent contravened section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 and that the discrimination claim succeeded. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic. | Upheld | — | £8,000 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay succeeded, with awards of £172 and £461.52 making £633.52 in total. The holiday-year dates in the extracted text appear internally inconsistent, but the award amounts are clear. | Upheld | — | £634 |
| Other | Further award of four weeks' pay for the respondent's failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,156
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £462
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.