Case 2303635/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Livingston v London South Bank University — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303635/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Livingston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South Employment Tribunal on 10, 11 and 12 March 2026 before Employment Judge Burge. The claimant represented herself and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the complaints of direct age discrimination and direct race discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed. It also records that the complaint of breach of contract was not well-founded and was dismissed. The text states that summary reasons were given orally and does not include written reasons.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct age discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.