Case 2303657/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Smart v Solus (London) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303657/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Smart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment delivered orally at the hearing and recorded on 7 October 2020 by Employment Judge Sage at London South Croydon. The issue recorded in the written judgment was whether the claimant's discrimination claims had been brought in time.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for discrimination were presented within such further period as was just and equitable and were therefore in time. The judgment does not set out further factual findings, identify any merits-based liability decision, or record any award.
No remedy was assessed, and the written record indicates that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the text supplied, the only determined issue is the limitation point in the claimant's favour.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Preliminary limitation decision only. The tribunal held that the claimant's discrimination claims were presented within such further period as was just and equitable and were therefore in time. No merits decision or remedy was recorded in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.