Case 2303659/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Lydon v Mastermind Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303659/2023
- Decision date
- 13 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Lydon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided the claim could properly be determined on the papers. The tribunal found that Mastermind Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr O Lydon’s wages in respect of unpaid commissions.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr O Lydon £4,047.26 gross in total. The judgment also records that Mr O Lydon must account to HMRC for any sums owed by him in respect of any part of the payment received pursuant to the judgment. The listed hearing on 03 November 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of unpaid commissions and ordered payment of £4,047.26 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,047 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,047
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.