Case 2303727/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Duffort v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303727/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Duffort
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claims of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, discrimination on the grounds of age, and harassment were not presented within the applicable time limit. It further found that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The tribunal found this claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal found this claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal found this claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The extracted judgment text does not specify the protected characteristic for the harassment claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.