Case 2303781/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Williams v Brighton and Hove City Council — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303781/2024
- Decision date
- 17 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms A Boyce, Ms N O’Hare
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mr M Williams’s claims of automatically unfair dismissal and ordinary unfair dismissal were not well-founded. Both claims against Brighton And Hove City Council were dismissed.
Full reasons were given orally at the hearing, but the written judgment records no further findings or legal tests. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair dismissal; the judgment does not identify the statutory basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.