Case 2303809/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JB Mandicourt v Glen Grant Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303809/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JB Mandicourt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr JB Mandicourt was employed by Glen Grant Limited from 19 October 2015 to 11 May 2017. He presented his tribunal claim on 9 September 2019, having said that the latest act complained of occurred on 3 August 2017. On that basis, the normal time limit expired on 16 December 2017 after accounting for early conciliation, so the discrimination claim was nearly 21 months out of time.
The tribunal applied the Equality Act 2010 time-limit provisions, including s.123 and the early conciliation extension in s.140B, and referred to the factors identified in British Coal Corporation v Keeble and s.33 Limitation Act 1980. It found the claimant's explanation that he needed to obtain information through a subject access request before bringing the claim was neither reasonable nor credible. The tribunal noted that he had raised a detailed grievance in April 2017, had taken advice from a law centre and solicitors, knew about tribunal time limits, and knew that tribunal disclosure existed as a process for obtaining documents.
The tribunal also found that the claimant did not act promptly when he later received the ICO's response on 5 July 2019, and that his explanation for waiting until 9 September 2019 was not persuasive. It accepted the respondent's case that delay would prejudice it because key individuals had left and memories would fade. On that basis, it held it would not be just and equitable to extend time.
For completeness, the tribunal dismissed the non-discrimination matters referred to on the claim form because it had no jurisdiction to determine data access or slander/defamation complaints. The final result was that all claims were dismissed and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Dismissed as presented out of time; the tribunal refused to extend time on a just and equitable basis under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed with the discrimination complaint as out of time; the tribunal declined to extend time. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Other | The claim form also referred to data access (GDPR) disrespect and slander/defamation; the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to decide those matters. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- just and equitable extension of time under s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.140B Equality Act 2010 early conciliation extension
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble [1997] IRLR 336
- s.33 Limitation Act 1980 factors
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.