Case 2303857/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Abourida v Thames Water Utilities Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303857/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Abourida
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the claimant's application dated 3 December 2025 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 17 November 2025.
The reason given was that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. The Tribunal stated that the requirements had been discussed at the hearing on 18 June 2025 and confirmed in writing, and that the claimant had every opportunity to make enquiries if he was unclear. The judgment also stated that the claimant remained able to pursue his remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refused the claimant's application for reconsideration of an earlier judgment. The text states that the claimant is still able to pursue his remaining claims, so the underlying race discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, and unlawful deduction from wages claims are not determined in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.