Case 2303862/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Dr M Nze v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303862/2017
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Dr M Nze
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the Claimant's application to amend his claim form to add disability discrimination claims against the Third Respondent. Following that decision, the claims remaining against the Second and Third Respondents under the case number were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The unfair dismissal claim against the First Respondent was also dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was disabled at all material times within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the Claimant was entitled to proceed with disability discrimination claims against the First Respondent; the substantive merits of those claims were not determined in this written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal refused the Claimant's application to amend his claim form to add disability discrimination claims against the Third Respondent. Claims remaining against the Second and Third Respondents under this case number were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim against the First Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found that the Claimant was disabled at all material times within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 and was entitled to proceed with disability discrimination claims against the First Respondent. The substantive discrimination claims against the First Respondent were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.