Case 2303995/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Matthews v Kent County Council, — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303995/2020
- Decision date
- 3 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Matthews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 June 2025, the Tribunal gave Mrs S Matthews an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The written record was approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 16 September 2025. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the pleaded heads of claim; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the pleaded heads of claim; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the pleaded heads of claim; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.