Case 2304018/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A P Fullbrook v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304018/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A P Fullbrook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 7 July 2021 giving a further opportunity to make representations on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had failed to identify any claim over which the tribunal had jurisdiction, and that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 August 2020.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as breach of contract, but the judgment text itself does not describe the underlying claim beyond stating that the claimant had failed to identify any claim over which the tribunal had jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.