Case 2304047/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Mielecka v Heathcotes Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304047/2022
- Decision date
- 16 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Mielecka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 24 January 2023 and 22 March 2023, the Tribunal invited Mrs R Mielecka to make representations or request a hearing on why her complaints of discrimination on the grounds of age and race should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 January 2023 and that the complaints had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Mielecka did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of age discrimination and race discrimination. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim continues and will be listed for hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The complaint of discrimination on the grounds of age was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 26 January 2023 and had not actively pursued it. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of discrimination on the grounds of race was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 26 January 2023 and had not actively pursued it. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.