Case 2304107/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs Nina Julian (2) Miss Poppy Keam (3) Mrs Lewis Edmunds (4) Mrs Michele Holland v St Christopher’s School (Canterbury) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304107/2018
- Decision date
- 19 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs Nina Julian (2) Miss Poppy Keam (3) Mrs Lewis Edmunds (4) Mrs Michele Holland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Michell, sitting alone at Croydon on 19 October 2020, heard the claims against St Christopher's School (Canterbury) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). The respondent did not appear but provided written submissions. The tribunal held that the claimants' complaints under s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well founded because there had been a complete failure to consult or provide the required information before the dismissals took effect, no employee representatives had been elected or appointed, and no special circumstances were shown to excuse non-compliance. In fixing the length of the award, the tribunal referred to Susie Radin Ltd v GMB and said the maximum period was just and equitable given the seriousness of the breach; it also noted the insolvency cases cited on special circumstances did not assist the respondent.
The tribunal made protective awards under s.189 of the 1992 Act for a 90-day protected period beginning on 31 August 2018 and ending on 27 December 2018. The awards were calculated individually by reference to each claimant's gross weekly wage: Mrs Nina Julian £5,178.08, Miss Poppy Keam £4,561.58, Mrs Lewis Edmunds £1,666.54, and Mrs Michele Holland £5,496.68. It also awarded each claimant notice pay for one full half term from 31 August 2018 to 28 October 2018, less statutory notice pay already received from the Insolvency Service, in the amounts of £1,472.73, £861.60, £402.93, and £1,563.52 respectively.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award under ss.188 and 189 TULRCA 1992 for failure to consult over redundancies. The tribunal fixed a protected period of 90 days beginning on 31 August 2018 and ending on 27 December 2018, and the individual sums were calculated by reference to gross weekly wage. | Upheld | — | £16,903 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim for one full half term from 31 August 2018 to 28 October 2018, less statutory notice pay already received from the Insolvency Service. The individual sums were calculated by reference to net weekly wage. | Upheld | — | £4,301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,204
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- s.195 TULRCA 1992
- Susie Radin Ltd v GMB [2004] IRLR 400
- The Bakers' Union v Clarks of Hove Ltd [1978] IRLR 366
- In re Hartlebury Printers Ltd and others (in liquidation) [1992] ICR 559
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.