Case 2304141/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gregory Mohan v Lanes Group plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304141/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gregory Mohan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a reconsideration judgment only. The tribunal set aside the judgment dated 25 January 2024 after the respondent provided evidence that a response had been uploaded on 20 September 2023, so the earlier judgment had been given in error.
The tribunal noted that it still had not received a copy of the Grounds of Resistance and directed that they should be provided to the tribunal and the claimant without delay. The hearing listed for 8 April 2024 at 10.00 was to be used for case management. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims were made in this document.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This reconsideration judgment did not determine the substantive employment claims. It set aside the judgment given on 25 January 2024 because the respondent had evidence that a response was uploaded on 20 September 2023, meaning the earlier judgment was given in error. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 72 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.