Case 2304148/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Tait v Kent County Council, — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304148/2020
- Decision date
- 25 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Tait
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 2 July 2025 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.