Case 2304359/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Trudi Dance v Kinleigh Ltd and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 2304359/2024
- Decision date
- 6 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Trudi Dance
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct sex discrimination and direct age discrimination against both respondents. It also dismissed the complaint of harassment related to age and/or sex against both respondents.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed. Remedy was adjourned against the First Respondent only to a date to be fixed, and no remedy figures were stated in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct sex discrimination against both respondents was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct age discrimination against both respondents was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment related to age and/or sex against both respondents was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.