Case 2304460/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v ISS Mediclean Ltd T/A ISS Facility Services Healthcare — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304460/2019
- Decision date
- 24 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held by telephone on 14 April 2020 before Employment Judge Cheetham QC, the tribunal dealt only with the claimant's pleaded claims at paragraphs 2.2 and 2.4 of the ET1. The judgment records that the claims under ss.47B and 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 and under s.12 Employment Relations Act 1999 were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability, no reasons on the merits of either claim, and no monetary award. It is a short disposal judgment recording withdrawal rather than a determination of the underlying factual disputes.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim pleaded as unfair dismissal and detriments under ss.47B and 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal recorded that it was dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim pleaded as unfair dismissal and detriments under s.12 Employment Relations Act 1999. The tribunal recorded that it was dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.