Case 2304728/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Pokawa v London Borough of Croydon — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304728/2019
- Decision date
- 16 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Pokawa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Croydon on 16 September 2020 before Employment Judge Nash by Cloud Video Platform. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had no reasonable prospects of success. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment records that the claimant's claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had no reasonable prospects of success. The supplied listing category identifies the case as Trade Union Membership, but the judgment text does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.