Case 2304757/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Elina Jacina v The Foster Partnership Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304757/2019
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Elina Jacina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response within the stipulated time, and judgment was entered in default under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It also found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, failure to comply with collective redundancy procedures giving rise to a protective award, unauthorised deductions from wages, and entitlement to unpaid holiday accrued at the effective date of termination.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the individual sums stated for those findings, including the protective award of 90 days' pay, with a total award of £16,616.57.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment in default under Rule 21. The judgment states the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy and separately awards loss of statutory rights of two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £862 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the Claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment in this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
| Other | Protective award for failure to comply with collective redundancy procedures, stated as 90 days' pay. | Upheld | — | £9,692 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,508 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the Claimant was entitled to unpaid holiday accrued at the effective date of termination. | Upheld | — | £1,109 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,617
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.