Case 2304770/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Bird & Ors v Senseco Systems Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304770/2021
- Decision date
- 1 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Bird & Ors
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by letter dated 17 February 2022, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 02 December 2022.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal decided that the claim should be struck out.
The hearing listed for 25 October 2022 was vacated and did not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim because the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order and did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. The extracted text refers to an order dated 02 December 2022, which appears inconsistent with the judgment date of 26 May 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.