Case 2304852/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Rachael Wells v Clarion Housing Group Ltd and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304852/2019
- Decision date
- 13 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms Rachael Wells
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment names Ms Rachael Wells as claimant and Clarion Housing Group Limited, Affinity Sutton Group Ltd, and Centra Care And Support Limited as respondents. It records that the claims against the second and third respondents, Affinity Sutton Group Ltd and Centra Care And Support Limited, were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the withdrawn claims and does not record any adjudicated findings on unfair dismissal, whistleblowing, breach of contract, or any other pleaded claim. It also does not record any remedy award or costs order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; it does not identify the substantive claim types or record an outcome against the first respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.