Case 2304870/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Oje Uankhoba v FedEx Express UK Transportation Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304870/2021
- Decision date
- 29 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Oje Uankhoba
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal decided that Mr F Oje Uankhoba's claim under the Equality Act 2010 did not have reasonable prospects of success. That claim was struck out. The written judgment does not identify the protected characteristic or the specific Equality Act claim in the extracted text.
The Tribunal also decided that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded. That claim failed and was dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing on 23 January 2024. The written judgment records no monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim under the Equality Act 2010 did not have reasonable prospects of success and was struck out; the extracted judgment text does not specify the protected characteristic or the precise Equality Act cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996, which was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.