Case 2304873/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Beckford v London & Quadrant Housing Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304873/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Beckford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Barker on 9 March 2022. The tribunal allowed the claimant's application to amend his claim so that London and Quadrant Housing Trust was substituted for Ms C Gillam as the respondent. The claim was dismissed against Ms Gillam and was permitted to proceed against London and Quadrant Housing Trust.
During the hearing, the claimant withdrew his age discrimination claim. The written judgment records that the age discrimination claim was withdrawn and dismissed. No substantive merits findings are set out in the written record provided.
The judgment also records that a case management discussion took place and that the discussion and any case management orders are contained in a separate document. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant withdrew the age discrimination claim during the preliminary hearing; the judgment records that it was then dismissed. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.