Case 2304938/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ideh v Cathay Investments Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304938/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ideh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this judgment dated 30 June 2023, Employment Judge Ramsden recorded that the claimant, Mr D Ideh, had withdrawn the complaints of harassment in relation to disability and the complaints of direct discrimination, harassment and victimisation related to race. Those complaints were dismissed following withdrawal.
The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of those claims. It records only that the listed claims were disposed of in that way, and that the claimant's remaining claims were to proceed to a hearing commencing on 18 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of harassment in relation to disability; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint of direct discrimination related to race; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to race; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint of victimisation related to race; dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.