Case 2305086/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Teelock v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305086/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Teelock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only live claim was unfair dismissal. The claimant had previously received a final written warning for inappropriate access to DWP records. A later Internal Abuse Team report identified one access, on 23 December 2022, to her brother's record through Searchlight using her account. The claimant denied making the access and said no one else had access to her computer or smartcard.
The tribunal found that the dismissing manager genuinely believed the claimant had committed misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and had carried out as much investigation as was reasonable in the circumstances. The audit material evidenced the access, and the tribunal considered that further evidence about what happened after the access was not reasonably necessary given the allegation was access without authority or legitimate business reason.
The tribunal accepted that there were procedural imperfections, including the investigation meeting invite referring to two accesses rather than one and the investigation manager not producing a separate investigation report. It found those matters did not undermine the overall fairness of the process. The tribunal held that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses because the further misconduct occurred while a final written warning for similar conduct was live, and the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of race discrimination was withdrawn at a preliminary hearing on 24 June 2024 and formally dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to a complaint of bullying/harassment, which was withdrawn at a preliminary hearing on 24 June 2024 and formally dismissed upon withdrawal. The protected characteristic, if any, is not clear from the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint in respect of notice pay was withdrawn at a preliminary hearing on 24 June 2024 and formally dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint in respect of unpaid holiday pay was withdrawn at a preliminary hearing on 24 June 2024 and formally dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
14 references- sections 94 & 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
- range of reasonable responses
- J Sainsbury plc v Hitt
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- A v B
- Taylor v OCS Group Ltd
- Davies v Sandwell MBC
- Wincanton Group plc v Stone
- Diosynth Ltd v Thomson
- Airbus UK Ltd v Webb
- Brito-Babapulle v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
- East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Sanders
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.