Karen Mayall v Nuffield Health — 2024

Case reference: 2305100/2023
Decision date: 5 December 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Representation

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Karen Mayall

Respondent

Nuffield Health

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded two adjudicated complaints: unfair dismissal and direct age discrimination. It held that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and that the claimant was fairly dismissed.

The tribunal also held that the complaint of direct age discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed it. The extracted judgment is a short written record of the decision, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons appear in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and that the claimant was fairly dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text.	Dismissed	—	—
Age discrimination	The judgment states the direct age discrimination complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text.	Dismissed	Age	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.