Case 2305118/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Blowers v Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305118/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
- Panel members
- Mr S Corkerton, Mr K Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Blowers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's constructive dismissal complaint, finding that she was not constructively unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
The tribunal also found no contravention of section 120(1) of the Equality Act 2010 in relation to direct race discrimination or victimisation. In addition, it found no breach of an equality clause in relation to the claimant's pay when compared with her named comparator.
The judgment records that race discrimination complaints arising before October 2018, and two alleged incidents in 2019 involving Mr Wright, were out of time. Apart from a separate equal pay claim that was stayed, the claimant's complaints were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not constructively unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found no contravention in respect of direct race discrimination. It also recorded that race discrimination complaints preceding October 2018 and two alleged incidents in 2019 involving Mr Wright were out of time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal found no contravention in respect of victimisation. The judgment does not expressly identify a protected act in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Equal pay | The tribunal found no breach of an equality clause in respect of the claimant's pay in comparison with the named comparator. Paragraph 5 also refers to a stayed equal pay claim, which appears distinct and was not adjudicated in this judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.120(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.