Case 2305243/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Zaluski v NSL Ltd Heard by video — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305243/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
- Panel members
- Dr N Westwood, Mrs S Dengate
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Zaluski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, chaired by Employment Judge Corrigan with Dr N Westwood and Mrs S Dengate, heard the claim by Mr P Zaluski against NSL Ltd by video on 12 and 13 January 2023. It found that the Respondent had contravened the Equality Act 2010 in respect of indirect race discrimination and race-related harassment.
The Tribunal did not find that the Respondent had contravened the Equality Act 2010 in respect of direct race discrimination. It also rejected the victimisation claim. The judgment text provided does not set out the detailed factual findings or reasoning beyond those outcome statements.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no award figure is stated. The decision was sent to the parties on 20 January 2023.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Harassment | Race-related harassment. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.