Case 2305259/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Nzeba v One Housing Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305259/2020
- Decision date
- 7 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Nzeba
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Keogh heard the case at London South by CVP on 7 April 2022. The written record states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and her automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were both dismissed because she was not an employee.
The judgment gives no further written reasons beyond that jurisdictional finding. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No remedy was awarded or recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.