Case 2305550/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. M Fontenelle v LTE Group — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305550/2023
- Decision date
- 11 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray
- Panel members
- Ms. S Dengate, Mr. S Huggins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. M Fontenelle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that, following a hearing in July 2025, the tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's complaints. It found the complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract/wrongful dismissal in relation to notice pay were not well-founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999. In addition, it dismissed the Equality Act complaints of direct sex discrimination, harassment related to sex, harassment related to race, and victimisation.
The judgment note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested. The written record supplied therefore sets out the outcomes of the claims but not the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment states this as breach of contract/wrongful dismissal in relation to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999; classified as 'other' because no more specific locked taxonomy category matches clearly. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The protected characteristic underlying the victimisation complaint is not specified in the written judgment record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.