Case 2305628/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Toyin Orisaremi v South Bank Colleges — 2026
- Case reference
- 2305628/2024
- Decision date
- 3 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Toyin Orisaremi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Toyin Orisaremi's claim against South Bank Colleges, the tribunal found that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. It dismissed the claims of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment.
The victimisation claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010 succeeded. The tribunal found that the successful victimisation claim was presented in time. It also found that the claimant was constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair.
The holiday pay claim for the 2022/23 leave year and the notice pay claim both succeeded in principle. The unauthorised deduction from wages claim concerning the April 2024 Statutory Sick Pay issue also succeeded.
Remedy for the successful complaints was reserved to a hearing listed for 12 October 2026. No monetary award was recorded in this judgment. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment records the decisions without setting out the underlying factual findings or detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment was dismissed alongside the disability discrimination complaints. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The section 27 Equality Act 2010 claim succeeded and was presented in time. The judgment does not identify the protected act. | Upheld | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.